THE MT VOID
Mt. Holz Science Fiction Society
09/07/01 -- Vol. 20, No. 10

Big Cheese: Mark Leeper, mleeper@optonline.net
Little Cheese: Evelyn Leeper, evelyn.leeper@excite.com
Back issues at http://www.geocities.com/evelynleeper
All material copyright by author unless otherwise noted.

To subscribe, send mail to mtvoid-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
To unsubscribe, send mail to mtvoid-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Topics:
	THE FINAL COUNTDOWN (comments)
	THE DEEP END (film review)

===================================================================

TOPIC: THE FINAL COUNTDOWN (comments by Mark R. Leeper):

With the release of PEARL HARBOR an Internet radio program played 
music from a lot of different films that treated the Japanese 
attack on December 7, 1941, beginning the Second World War for a 
country that was unaware that it had already been going on for 
27 months.  (In fact, really the war's most significant blow to 
the German Western Front had already been struck by Britain, 
though virtually nobody, least of all the Germans, knew it at 
the time.  Or am I being enigmatic?)  But we were talking in 
this article about the Pacific War.  

In any case, the 1980 film THE FINAL COUNTDOWN has always seemed 
a little strange to me.  In the first place, I do not remember 
there being a countdown anywhere in the film, final or 
otherwise.  The film is  really just a dressed up version of a 
"Twilight Zone" episode.  (Not that that is a surprise.  For 
five seasons "Twilight Zone" churned out an idea a week.  Some 
were just ghastly, but some were pretty good ideas and a lot of 
the fantasy films that came out after those five seasons show 
the influence of "Twilight Zone."  CARNIVAL OF SOULS is a very  
effective horror film, but it is made of elements taken from 
"Twilight  Zone" episodes, particularly "The Hitchhiker." I am 
told that Spielberg paid royalties to Richard Matheson because 
he openly borrowed part of the plot of POLTERGEIST from the 
"Twilight Zone" episode "Little Girl Lost" where a little girl 
has to be retrieved after falling into another dimensional 
universe.)  The "Twilight Zone" episode "The 7th Is Made Up  of 
Phantoms" has a tank crew getting lost in time and finding 
themselves at the Little Bighorn.  This is the idea that was 
recycled for THE FINAL COUNTDOWN, though there it was an 
aircraft carrier that found itself at Pearl Harbor just prior to 
the Japanese attack.  (Time travel fiction seems to think that 
the laws of physics seem to have some particular interest in 
important events of American and occasionally European history.  
Nobody ever gets dropped in the middle of an empty plain  
someplace with nothing much of interest happening within 2000 
miles.  Nobody ever gets dropped in the middle of even a Chinese 
war, much less an ant war.  Anyway, THE FINAL COUNTDOWN has the 
USS Nimitz dropped just off Pearl Harbor just before the 
Japanese attack.  While the commander discovers he cannot stay 
around for the actual attack, he can take on some of the 
vanguard of the Japanese planes headed for the raid.   

What does Captain Yelland (played by Kirk Douglas) discover? Sure 
enough modern planes are really good at taking out 1941 Japanese 
bombers.  Apparently this film and their victory has become a 
point of pride with the real United States Navy.  They have 
taken John Scott's score for THE  FINAL COUNTDOWN and use it in 
Navy recruiting films.  This strikes me as a little odd since it 
is a commonly known truism of military history that countries are 
always preparing to be ready to fight their previous wars.  As 
we entered World War II we were really very ready to fight World 
War I.  They are always ready to fight war in a way that would 
have been state of the art the last time they fought.  It is 
great that the Navy is so proud of the message that they are all 
set to fight World War II again and this time we could 
decisively beat the Japanese.  This may not be such a thing to 
be proud of.  The film shows us valiantly beating 1940s Japanese 
planes with 1970s American planes.  Actually, unless my memory 
is failing me, I think we did decisively beat the Japanese and we  
did it using 1940s weapons.  I am pretty sure that some 
government policy says that we fight wars using contemporarily 
available weapons exclusively.  I guess someone thinks that is a 
real triumph or there would not have been a film made about it.   

Perhaps this discussion would not be complete without mentioning 
the  classic written story along the lines of modern in previous 
is "A Hawk Among Sparrows" by Dean McLaughlin.  In this story a 
modern fighter pilot finds himself and his plane back in World 
War I fighting biplanes.  He discovers much to his chagrin that 
while the biplanes cannot do a lot to hurt him, he cannot do 
much to hurt the biplanes.  Heat-seeking  missiles need to seek a 
lot of heat.  The motorized box kites that were the planes of 
World War I just do not generate much heat and are safe from 
modern missiles.  It is impossible without stalling out to slow  
down a modern fighter enough so that it can even engage a 
biplane.   However, ...  Well, it is a good story.  Places where 
it can be found are listed:  

--Analog Magazine, July 1968
--ANALOG 8, edited by John W. Campbell
--HAWK AMONG SPARROWS, chosen by Dean McLaughlin
--WAR AND PEACE (ANTHOLOGY #6), edited by Stanley Schmidt

[-mrl]

===================================================================

TOPIC: THE DEEP END (a film review by Mark R. Leeper):

    CAPSULE: Tilda Swinton stars as a mother who tries to hide the 
    death of her son's male lover and in the process gets herself 
    involved in a web of blackmail and deceit.  Swinton gives a 
    very good performance, but her character is more like a cork 
    in water buffeted by the force of those around her than a 
    person who takes action.  The film is tense but not entirely 
    satisfying.  Rating: 6 (0 to 10), high +1 (-4 to +4)

For any thriller to work fully there are two real requirements.  
The viewer has to have some emotional investment in the 
characters, particularly the main character, and the characters 
have to make choices that will affect the outcome of the story.  
If we do not care what happens to the main character we might as 
well be watching pieces on a chessboard.  If the people in the 
story do not make judgments and choices then they might as well be 
on a thrill ride at an amusement park following its inevitable 
track.  They just ride through the various dangers they face.  In 
THE DEEP END we are given reason to empathize with Margaret Hall 
(played by Tilda Swinton), but after the first half-hour or so she 
is mostly doing just what she has to do.  While other characters 
are complex and at times do the unexpected, once we know Margaret 
well enough to care for her, we also know the choices that she 
will make.  And by never doing anything unexpected she loses much 
of her interest value.  The film is almost a morality tale.  
Having made a bad choice at the beginning, this long chain of 
events is what she has earned for herself.

Margaret Hall lives with her family in an idyllic existence in a 
nice house on Lake Tahoe.  Her son Beau (Jonathan Tucker) is a 
promising music student making applications to various colleges.  
Margaret's one wish is to protect Beau from the clutches of a male 
lover whom she is sure just wants to use her son.  After a 
clandestine assignation between the two Margaret finds the lover 
dead.  Without telling anyone she decides to hide the body so her 
son will not be implicated in the investigation.  This leaves her 
prey to blackmail and a horrific chain of events.

Swinton is known mostly for roles of women who have foregone 
anything like a "normal" lifestyle.  Somehow her unusual, almost 
albino, looks lead to unusual roles.  In ORLANDO she plays her 
best known role, an immortal who at one point for no obvious 
reason spontaneously changes gender from male to female.  
Frequently she plays women of power.  It is a little odd seeing 
her play a housewife who at least starts out somewhat typical.  Of 
course not long into the movie she is juggling her life as a 
housewife with her secret life dealing with blackmailers.  The man 
who has contacted her for hush money also shows sides to his 
personality we would not expect.  

This is the second screen adaptation of the 1947 novel THE BLANK 
WALL by Elizabeth Sanxay Holding.  The first was the 1949 film THE 
RECKLESS MOMENT with James Mason and Joan Bennett directed by Max 
Ophuls.  Ophuls chose to use actors who would be familiar to 
audiences, hence making it a glossier production.  The team of 
Scott McGehee and David Siegal who have been writing and directing 
thrillers since 1993's SUTURE.  Here again they wrote and 
directed.  They chose to use generally less familiar actors than 
the previous version.  Only Swinton and character actor Peter 
Donat were even vaguely familiar to me.

THE DEEP END is a well-acted story of a woman who makes one 
mistake and then faces some fairly harrowing consequences.  I rate 
it a 6 on the 0 to 10 scale and a high +1 on the -4 to +4 scale.  
[-mrl]

===================================================================

                                          Mark Leeper
                                          mleeper@optonline.net

	When a man wants to murder a tiger he calls it sport;
	when a tiger wants to murder him he calls it ferocity. 
                                          --George Bernard Shaw


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
The Nissan Sentra
Everything but compact
http://NissanDriven.com
http://us.click.yahoo.com/3vsIKC/txlCAA/ySSFAA/J.MolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
mtvoid-unsubscribe@egroups.com

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/